Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-06-19 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is much better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 score. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy A71 5G has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 4700mAh battery size. Galaxy A71 5G takes slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.