Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-09-04 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G works with Android OS, and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) works with Android 15 OS. Galaxy A90 5G features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 4% bigger battery capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a back camera with more mega-pixels, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.