Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-02-24 |
| -- | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 367 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting an 81 score against 79.2. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Galaxy C9 Pro has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way better video definition, a lot higher resolution back camera and a larger aperture to capture better low light captures.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features superior battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has an 18% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.