Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-04-05 |
| -- | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| -- | 424 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZ2, getting a 79.2 score against 79.1. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s design is much newer and notably thinner, but a bit heavier than Sony Xperia XZ2. The Xperia XZ2 has a way better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Xperia XZ2 has a much better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display and much lower brightness. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot more mega pixels back camera and a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Xperia XZ2, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.