Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-08-29 |
| -- | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| -- | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| -- | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting an 85.5 score against 79.2. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen and way darker display. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with slightly more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a larger camera aperture, a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a much higher video quality.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with superior battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has an 18 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.