Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2008-08-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 3.86 x 1.97 x 0.64 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 182 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| -- | 6 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32,77 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 910mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 234 hours standby time 4.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Motorola RAZR VE20, with an 83.7 score against 35.3. Even though the LG V50 ThinQ is noticeably heavier than Motorola RAZR VE20, it's much thinner and also noticeably newer. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better screen than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has a much higher pixels count per inch in the display, a way larger screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has 8 more processing cores. LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has 128 GB internal memory. LG V50 ThinQ features a much longer battery duration than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Motorola RAZR VE20, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola RAZR VE20, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.