Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2011-08-05 | 2019-12-27 |
| 4.49 x 2.44 x 0.47 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.02 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 289.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Single-Core 800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (24 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is much better than Motorola Spice XT, getting an 85.5 score against 48.9. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has older 11 version and Motorola Spice XT has Android 2.3.4 version. Although Galaxy A51 is notably heavier than the Motorola Spice XT, it's much thinner and noticeably newer.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much sharper screen than Motorola Spice XT, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a way bigger display and a lot more pixels per display inch. Galaxy A51 has a much better performing processor than Motorola Spice XT, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more cpu cores and 3,5 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A51 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Spice XT, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Spice XT, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A51 features a way better battery duration than Motorola Spice XT, because it has a 160% bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A51 is also cheap compared to the other phone, making it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.