Compare phones
Motorola Tundra
VA76rSamsung Star
GT-S5230| Global Score | |
| 35.4 | 38.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2008-09-23 | 2009-03-10 |
| 3.86 x 2.14 x 0.94 inches | 4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 3.25 ounces |
| $ 170.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 3 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 400 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 182 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Resistive |
| 6.1 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 102,4 MB internal memory | 51,2 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 3.20 MP |
| -- | 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 4.73 | 5.39 |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.9 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1130mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 337 hours standby time 5.9 hours talk time | 800 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 2.8 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Accelerometer |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Star is a little bit better than Motorola Tundra, getting a score of 38.4 against 35.4. Even though the Samsung Star and the Motorola Tundra were released with only 6 months difference, the Samsung Star is thinner and lighter. Motorola Tundra has a bit better display than Samsung Star, because although it has a way smaller display and a little bit worse 320 x 240 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite better number of pixels per screen inch.
The Motorola Tundra has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Star, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 102,4 MB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Star counts with a processor that is very similar to the Motorola Tundra one, both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Tundra features a little better battery life than Samsung Star, because it has a 1130mAh battery size. The Samsung Star captures better pictures and videos than Motorola Tundra, because it has a lot higher 3.2 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Star not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.