Compare phones
Samsung Chrono
SCH-R260, SCH-R261, SCH-R261A| Global Score | |
| 33.1 | 36.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2008-10-06 | 0000-00-00 |
| 3.65 x 2.09 x 0.76 inches | 3.70 x 1.83 x 0.67 inches |
| 3.40 ounces | 3.14 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | 2 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 157 pixels per inch | 200 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 6.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.94 |
| Storage | |
| 15,36 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.3 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 447 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 526 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
The Samsung Chrono has an overall score of 36.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola VU204's overall score of 33.1. Samsung Chrono's construction is a bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola VU204. Samsung Chrono has a bit better screen than Motorola VU204, because it has a higher resolution of 320 x 240px, a better pixel amount per inch of display and a quite bigger screen.
Motorola VU204 features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Chrono. The Samsung Chrono counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola VU204, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Chrono also has an additional graphics processing unit.
The Motorola VU204 counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Chrono, because it has 950mAh of battery capacity against 800mAh. Samsung Chrono features a camera that's just as good as the camera in Motorola VU204, both have a 0.3 megapixels camera in the back.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Chrono is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.