Compare phones
Motorola W175
W175, W175g, W180| Global Score | |
| 28.6 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Cricket |
| 2007-10-11 | 2009-09-22 |
| 4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 2.99 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| 101 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 940mAh Li-Ion Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 465 hours standby time 9.8 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola W175 is a bit better than the Cricket CAPTR, with a overall score of 28.6 against 27.9. The Motorola W175 is an older and just a bit heavier phone than the Cricket CAPTR, but Motorola was able to build it much thinner anyway. Motorola W175 and Cricket CAPTR count with very similar processing units, both have 0 cores.
Cricket CAPTR counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola W175, because it has a quite better resolution of 160 x 128 and a just a bit greater screen pixels density. Cricket CAPTR takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola W175. Cricket CAPTR counts with as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as Motorola W175.
The Cricket CAPTR's battery duration is just as good as the battery lifetime in Motorola W175, although the Cricket CAPTR has just 920mAh battery capacity.
Motorola W175 and the Cricket CAPTR cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.