Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.136.4
Basic Information
MotorolaLG
--2009-03-30
3.74 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches4.16 x 2.11 x 0.62 inches
2.68 ounces3.81 ounces
$ 139.00$ 125.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches2.8 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
114 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.36
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
4,61 MB internal memory81,92 MB internal memory
microSD (up to 2 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.640.5
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
3.634.84
GPRS and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.9
Battery Life
910mAh Li-Ion Battery950mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
300 hours standby time
8.3 hours talk time
264 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.42.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.0
--GPS
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The LG Xenon is just a bit better than the Motorola W403, with a general score of 36.4 against 33.1. LG Xenon is a way heavier but just a little bit thinner phone than the Motorola W403. LG Xenon counts with a better screen than Motorola W403, because it has a lot higher 400 x 240 resolution, a much bigger display and a better display pixels density.

The Motorola W403 has a much greater storage to install games and applications than LG Xenon, although it has just 4,61 MB internal memory. The LG Xenon's processing unit is just as good as the Motorola W403 one, both have a 0-Core processor. The LG Xenon counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola W403, because it has a 4% greater battery size.

The LG Xenon takes way better photos and videos than Motorola W403, because it has a lot more megapixels back facing camera.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG Xenon is also the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.