Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 2.3, 2.2 | -- |
| 2011-05-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.70 x 2.40 x 0.51 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.10 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 186 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP3620 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 380 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is way better than the Motorola XPRT, with a score of 80.7 against 51.5. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is a lot newer and much thinner, but also much heavier than Motorola XPRT. Google Pixel 3 XL has a really superior performance than Motorola XPRT, because it has a greater number of cores and 3,5 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola XPRT, because it has a way bigger screen, a lot greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution. Google Pixel 3 XL has a much better camera than Motorola XPRT, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola XPRT, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 3 XL features a much better battery performance than Motorola XPRT, because it has a 3430mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 3 XL is also cheaper than the Motorola XPRT, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.