Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.3, 2.2 | -- |
| 2011-05-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.70 x 2.40 x 0.51 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.10 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 186 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP3620 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 380 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is much better than Motorola XPRT's 51.5 overall score. Although the Galaxy A50 is heavier than Motorola XPRT, it's thinner and also extremely newer. Galaxy A50 counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola XPRT, because it has a way higher pixels number per display inch, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a way larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features an extremely better processor than Motorola XPRT, because it has 3,5 GB more RAM and 7 more processing cores. Galaxy A50 features a much better memory for applications and games than Motorola XPRT, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 shoots way better photos and videos than Motorola XPRT, because it has a lot more MP back camera and a lot better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Motorola XPRT, because it has a 115 percent more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little more expensive than the Motorola XPRT, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.