Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| NEC | |
| Android 4.0 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.02 x 2.54 x 0.57 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.06 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 640 pixels (VGA) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 258 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 348 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a lot better than NEC Terrain, getting a global score of 82.5 against 54.4. The Google Pixel 2 XL body is incredibly thinner but a little bit heavier than NEC Terrain. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a quite better performance than NEC Terrain, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and more cores.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a sharper display than NEC Terrain, because it has a lot better pixels density, a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a lot bigger screen. Google Pixel 2 XL features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than NEC Terrain, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 XL captures way better videos and photos than NEC Terrain, because it has a way better video definition and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution. Google Pixel 2 XL features a very superior battery lifetime than NEC Terrain, because it has an 85% greater battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also the cheapest one, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.