Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| NEC | |
| Android 4.0 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.02 x 2.54 x 0.57 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.06 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 640 pixels (VGA) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 258 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 348 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is way better than the NEC Terrain, getting an 80 score against 54.4. Google Pixel 3's construction is incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter than the NEC Terrain. Google Pixel 3 features a superior processor than NEC Terrain, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better display than NEC Terrain, because it has a much higher screen pixels density, a lot larger display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than NEC Terrain, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 features a much better battery life than NEC Terrain, because it has a 2915mAh battery size. Google Pixel 3 has a greater camera than NEC Terrain, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 costs a little more money than NEC Terrain, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.