Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| NIU | |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 4.65 x 2.46 x 0.53 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.81 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, White and Yellow | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.39 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 620 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a lot better than the NIU Niutek 3.5D, with an 82.5 score against 43.7. The Google Pixel 2 XL is a much heavier but extremely thinner cellphone than NIU Niutek 3.5D. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a greater performance than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a way better screen than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because it has a much higher display density, a much bigger display and a lot better 1440 x 2880px resolution. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a lot better camera than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with much more storage for applications and games than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 2 XL has a much better battery life than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because it has a 3520mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also a bit cheaper, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.