Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| NIU | |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.65 x 2.46 x 0.53 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.81 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, White and Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.39 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 620 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is way better than the NIU Niutek 3.5D's global score of 43.7. The Google Pixel 3 design is much heavier but a lot thinner than NIU Niutek 3.5D. The Google Pixel 3 counts with an incredibly better screen than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px, a way greater pixels density and a lot bigger display.
The Google Pixel 3 features a greater performance than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 3,75 GB more RAM. Google Pixel 3 shoots much better photographs and videos than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because it has a lot better (4K) video definition and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Google Pixel 3 has a very superior memory for games and applications than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 3 features a very superior battery duration than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because it has a 108 percent more battery size.
Google Pixel 3 is a little more expensive than the NIU Niutek 3.5D, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.