Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| NIU | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.65 x 2.46 x 0.53 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.81 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, White and Yellow | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.39 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 620 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is way better than the NIU Niutek 3.5D, getting a score of 83.3 against 43.7. The Galaxy S9 is a extremely thinner but much heavier phone than NIU Niutek 3.5D. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a lot better screen than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because it has a really bigger screen, a way greater display density and a way better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Galaxy S9 counts with a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S9 features a much greater processing power than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more cores and 3,75 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S9 has a much better battery duration than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 1400mAh. The Galaxy S9 has a much better camera than NIU Niutek 3.5D, because it has a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Galaxy S9 costs a little more than NIU Niutek 3.5D, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.