Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 41.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| NIU | Samsung |
| Android 2.3 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.47 x 2.44 x 0.54 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.28 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.29 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 850 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
| Digital TV Broadcast | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is way better than the NIU Niutek 3G 3.5B, getting an 83.3 score against 41.2. Galaxy S9's design is incredibly heavier but thinner than NIU Niutek 3G 3.5B. The Galaxy S9 features a way better looking display than NIU Niutek 3G 3.5B, because it has a way higher pixels density, a way better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a lot larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much more powerful CPU than NIU Niutek 3G 3.5B, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 7 more CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than NIU Niutek 3G 3.5B, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 400 GB.
Galaxy S9 captures a lot better videos and photos than NIU Niutek 3G 3.5B, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher 12 MP resolution. Galaxy S9 has a much longer battery life than NIU Niutek 3G 3.5B, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 1300mAh.
The Galaxy S9 costs a bit more than NIU Niutek 3G 3.5B, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.