Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| NIU | |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.00 x 2.48 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.62 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 630 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a general score of 82.5, which is much better than NIU Niutek 4.0D's 46.3 global score. The Google Pixel 2 XL body is way heavier but much thinner than NIU Niutek 4.0D. Google Pixel 2 XL has a better performance than NIU Niutek 4.0D, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a brighter screen than NIU Niutek 4.0D, because it has a really bigger display, a lot higher display pixels density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than NIU Niutek 4.0D, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 127,49 GB more internal memory.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a much longer battery life than NIU Niutek 4.0D, because it has a 135 percent greater battery capacity. Google Pixel 2 XL captures much clearer videos and photos than NIU Niutek 4.0D, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a much better 12.2 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.