Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| NIU | |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.00 x 2.48 x 0.39 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.62 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 630 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is much better than NIU Niutek 4.0D's 46.3 overall score. Google Pixel 3 is a somewhat heavier but much thinner device than the NIU Niutek 4.0D. The Google Pixel 3 features a quite better processing power than NIU Niutek 4.0D, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and 3,75 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a better looking display than NIU Niutek 4.0D, because it has a way better pixels density, a lot better 1080 x 2160 resolution and a way larger screen. The Google Pixel 3 has a much better memory to install applications and games than NIU Niutek 4.0D, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory.
Google Pixel 3 features a lot better camera than NIU Niutek 4.0D, because it has a way better video resolution and a camera in the back with way more MP. The Google Pixel 3 features a superior battery duration than NIU Niutek 4.0D, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 is a little more expensive than the NIU Niutek 4.0D, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.