Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.3 | 50.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| NIU | ZTE |
| Android 4.2 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-03-30 |
| 5.00 x 2.48 x 0.39 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.62 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| $ 155.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 233 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.42 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2200mAh Micro SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 630 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The ZTE Tempo Go has a score of 50.8, which is slightly better than NIU Niutek 4.0D's score of 46.3. ZTE Tempo Go's design is noticeably lighter and a little thinner than the NIU Niutek 4.0D. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but ZTE Tempo Go has 8.1 Oreo version while NIU Niutek 4.0D has Android 4.2, giving a lot of extra features.
NIU Niutek 4.0D has a more vivid screen than ZTE Tempo Go, because although it has a little lower 800 x 480 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display. NIU Niutek 4.0D has a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Tempo Go, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU.
NIU Niutek 4.0D captures much clearer photographs and videos than ZTE Tempo Go. Both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rates and the same resolution camera in the back. The ZTE Tempo Go features much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than NIU Niutek 4.0D, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo Go also has more internal storage.
ZTE Tempo Go has a much longer battery duration than NIU Niutek 4.0D, because it has 2200mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
ZTE Tempo Go is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.