Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| NIU | |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.42 x 2.68 x 0.41 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 640 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is much better than the NIU Niutek 4.5D, having a overall score of 80 against 46.4. Google Pixel 3's construction is just a little bit heavier but extremely thinner than the NIU Niutek 4.5D. The Google Pixel 3 features a greater processing power than NIU Niutek 4.5D, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Google Pixel 3 features a sharper screen than NIU Niutek 4.5D, because it has a way better amount of pixels per screen inch, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a larger screen. Google Pixel 3 features a very superior storage to install games and applications than NIU Niutek 4.5D, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 63,49 GB more internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a really longer battery performance than NIU Niutek 4.5D, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3 shoots way better pictures and videos than NIU Niutek 4.5D, because it has a lot higher video resolution and a lot higher 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Google Pixel 3 costs a bit more than NIU Niutek 4.5D, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.