Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.4 | 50.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| NIU | ZTE |
| Android 4.2 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-03-30 |
| 5.42 x 2.68 x 0.41 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | -- |
| $ 155.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 218 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.42 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2200mAh Micro SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 640 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
ZTE Tempo Go has a general score of 50.8, which is just a bit better than the NIU Niutek 4.5D's 46.4 global score. ZTE Tempo Go's body is somewhat thinner and lighter than NIU Niutek 4.5D. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but ZTE Tempo Go has newer 8.1 Oreo version while NIU Niutek 4.5D has Android 4.2, offering some nice extra features.
The NIU Niutek 4.5D features a more vivid screen than ZTE Tempo Go, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 854 x 480px resolution, the NIU Niutek 4.5D also counts with a bit better pixel amount per inch of screen. The ZTE Tempo Go counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than NIU Niutek 4.5D, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo Go also has 8 GB internal storage.
NIU Niutek 4.5D features a bit more powerful CPU than ZTE Tempo Go, because although it has lesser cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU. NIU Niutek 4.5D features a superior camera than ZTE Tempo Go. Both have a 5 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the same video frame rate and the same (HD) video definition.
ZTE Tempo Go has longer battery life than NIU Niutek 4.5D, because it has a 2200mAh battery size instead of 1650mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the ZTE Tempo Go is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.