Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.2 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Cricket |
| 2007-05-03 | 2009-09-22 |
| 4.09 x 1.73 x 0.70 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 2.82 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 39.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 420 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Cricket CAPTR is better than Nokia 1650, getting a score of 27.9 against 24.2. Cricket CAPTR's design weights the same than Nokia 1650, but it's just a little bit thicker. The Cricket CAPTR counts with an incredibly better screen than Nokia 1650. They have the same 160 x 128px resolution. The Cricket CAPTR and Nokia 1650 feature really similar memory for apps and games.
Cricket CAPTR has a CPU that is very similar to Nokia 1650's processor, they have a 0-Core processor. The Cricket CAPTR captures much better photos and videos than Nokia 1650. Nokia 1650 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Cricket CAPTR, because it has a 1020mAh battery capacity.
Cricket CAPTR is a little more expensive than Nokia 1650, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.