Compare phones
Nokia 1661
1661, 1662| Global Score | |
| 27.3 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Cricket |
| 2008-11-04 | 2009-09-22 |
| 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 2.89 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 114 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 500 hours standby time 3.9 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.32 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Cricket CAPTR is a little bit better than the Nokia 1661, with a general score of 27.9 against 27.3. Cricket CAPTR's body is newer and a little bit lighter, but also notably thicker than Nokia 1661. Cricket CAPTR and Nokia 1661 both count with quite similar processors, both have a 0-Core CPU. The Cricket CAPTR counts with a bit better looking display than Nokia 1661. They have an equal resolution of 160 x 128 pixels, a screen with the same size and the same pixels density.
The Cricket CAPTR features a much better camera than Nokia 1661. Cricket CAPTR features as much memory to install applications and games as the Nokia 1661. Cricket CAPTR counts with a bit longer battery life than Nokia 1661, because it has a 7% larger battery size.
The Cricket CAPTR costs the same than the Nokia 1661.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.