Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-09-23 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.53 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Charcoal, Dusk and Fjord | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 139.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a score of 77.9, which is better than Nokia 2.4's 65.6 global score. The Motorola DROID Turbo design is a bit lighter than Nokia 2.4, but it is noticeably thicker and was released 6 years before. These devices use Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version and Nokia 2.4 has Android 11.
Motorola DROID Turbo has just a little better processing power than Nokia 2.4, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processor and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola DROID Turbo has an incredibly better looking display than Nokia 2.4, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a way higher screen density.
Nokia 2.4 has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola DROID Turbo captures much better videos and photos than Nokia 2.4, because it has a much higher (4K) video quality, a larger aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Nokia 2.4 counts with a bit better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.