Search


Compare phones

Samsung Wave Y

S5380, S5380K, S5380B, S5380D, S5380L, S5380E
Global Score
31.346.6
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
--bada 2.0
2008-01-220000-00-00
4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches4.33 x 2.29 x 0.48 inches
2.57 ounces3.61 ounces
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 69.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--3.2 inches
128 x 160 pixels 320 x 480 pixels
TFTTFT
82 pixels per inch180 pixels per inch
No touch screenMulti-touch
4.96.6
processor Single-Core 832 MHz processor
GPUARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU
5.767.29
Storage
10,24 MB internal memory153,6 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.20.7
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
--320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution
3.634.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.33.3
Battery Life
870mAh Li-Ion Battery1200mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
580 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
570 hours standby time
6.7 hours talk time
2.42.88
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 3.0
--GPS
--NFC
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Samsung Wave Y has a global score of 46.6, which is way better than the Nokia 2600 classic's 31.3 overall score. Despite being the best in this review, Samsung Wave Y's body is heavier and a little thicker than Nokia 2600 classic. The Samsung Wave Y has a much better hardware performance than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has 1 more processing cores and an extra graphics co-processor.

The Samsung Wave Y counts with a way better display than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has a way higher resolution of 480 x 320 and a way better screen pixel density. The Samsung Wave Y has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has 153,6 MB internal memory capacity.

The Samsung Wave Y has a very superior camera than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has a lot better resolution back-facing camera. The Samsung Wave Y counts with a very superior battery life than Nokia 2600 classic, because it has a 1200mAh battery size.

The Samsung Wave Y costs a little more money than the Nokia 2600 classic, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.