Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.639.5
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
--2012-10-15
4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches3.84 x 1.99 x 0.72 inches
2.85 ounces3.70 ounces
Blue, Gray, Pink and White--
$ 65.00$ 65.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches2.4 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
114 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.45.9
Performance
--Qualcomm QSC6155 chipset
processor Single-Core 480 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.57
microSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.760
Camera
0.30 MP1.30 MP
3.634.51
EDGE and GSM--
SIM--
0.30
Battery Life
860mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
312 hours standby time
4.5 hours talk time
240 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.322.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 3.0
--GPS

Comparison review

Samsung M400 has a general score of 39.5, which is way better than Nokia 2690's 31.6 global score. The Samsung M400 design is extremely thicker and a lot heavier than the Nokia 2690. The Samsung M400 has a slightly better looking display than Nokia 2690, because it has a lot larger display, a higher number of pixels per display inch and a way better 320 x 240px resolution.

The Nokia 2690 counts with much more storage for apps and games than Samsung M400, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 8 GB. Samsung M400 counts with a better CPU than Nokia 2690, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster). Samsung M400 features a very superior camera than Nokia 2690, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.

The Samsung M400 has improved battery duration than Nokia 2690, because it has a 1000mAh battery size against 860mAh.

The Samsung M400 costs the same than Nokia 2690.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.