Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.5 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo, 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.0 |
| 2018-07-02 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.76 x 2.70 x 0.34 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.88 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 310 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2990mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a score of 71.5, which is just a bit better than Nokia 3.1's 65.5 score. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket's construction has the same thickness than Nokia 3.1, but it's a bit lighter. These phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has an older 4.0 version while Nokia 3.1 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Nokia 3.1 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and 1 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a more vivid screen than Nokia 3.1, although it has a little smaller screen, a little bit lower pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 3.1, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 64 GB. Nokia 3.1 counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 42% greater battery capacity.
The Nokia 3.1 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Nokia 3.1 also has a much higher resolution back facing camera and a way bigger aperture.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S III Cricket is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.