Search


Compare phones

Global Score
23.360.3
Basic Information
NokiaMotorola
--Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3
--2013-11-13
4.64 x 1.95 x 0.87 inches5.11 x 2.59 x 0.46 inches
3.76 ounces5.04 ounces
--Black, Blue, Pink, Red, White and Yellow
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 95.00$ 99.00
Display / Screen
--4.5 inches
96 x 65 pixels 720 x 1280 pixels (HD)
LCDIPS LCD
--326 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
2.88.3
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset
processor Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor
--1 GB RAM
GPUAdreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU
5.768.37
Storage
--8 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
03.3
Camera
--5.00 MP + 1.30 MP
--1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution
06.82
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
GPRS and GSMHSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA
SIMSIM
0.24.8
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery2070mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
240 hours standby time
5.5 hours talk time
350 hours standby time
2.564
Other Features
--Bluetooth 4.0
--GPS
--Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Motorola Moto G is much better than the Nokia 3595, getting a general score of 60.3 against 23.3. Motorola Moto G is a way heavier but way thinner cellphone than Nokia 3595. The Moto G has a much faster processor than Nokia 3595, because it has a graphics co-processor and 4 more cpu cores. The Moto G has a lot better looking display than Nokia 3595, because it has a much higher resolution of 1280 x 720.

The Moto G has much more storage for apps and games than Nokia 3595. The Motorola Moto G counts with a very superior battery performance than Nokia 3595, because it has a 107% greater battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Nokia 3595.

Moto G costs a little more money than Nokia 3595, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.