Search


Compare phones

Global Score
23.366.3
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
--Android 4.2.2, 4.1, 4.0.4, 4.0.1, 4.0
--2011-11-17
4.64 x 1.95 x 0.87 inches5.33 x 2.67 x 0.37 inches
3.76 ounces5.29 ounces
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 95.00$ 95.00
Display / Screen
--4.7 inches
96 x 65 pixels 720 x 1280 pixels (HD)
LCDSuper AMOLED
--312 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
2.88.2
Performance
--TI OMAP4460 chipset
processorARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor
--1 GB RAM
GPUPowerVR SGX540 (384 MHz) GPU
5.768.1
Storage
--32 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
05.8
Camera
--5.00 MP + 1.30 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
07.81
Networks
--Wi-Fi
GPRS and GSMLTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA
SIM--
0.25
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery1850mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
240 hours standby time
5.5 hours talk time
150 hours standby time
12 hours talk time
2.563.76
Other Features
--Bluetooth 3.0
--GPS
--NFC
--Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Galaxy Nexus CDMA is way better than the Nokia 3595, with a general score of 66.3 against 23.3. The Galaxy Nexus CDMA body is extremely heavier but way thinner than the Nokia 3595. The Galaxy Nexus CDMA has a much more vibrant display than Nokia 3595, because it has a way better 1280 x 720 resolution.

The Galaxy Nexus CDMA has a much more powerful CPU than Nokia 3595, because it has an extra graphics processor and a higher number of cores. Galaxy Nexus CDMA counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia 3595. The Samsung Galaxy Nexus CDMA has a very superior battery life than Nokia 3595, because it has 1850mAh of battery capacity.

The Galaxy Nexus CDMA takes much better photographs and videos than Nokia 3595.

The Galaxy Nexus CDMA costs exactly the same than Nokia 3595.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.