Search


Compare phones

Global Score
23.373.2
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
--Android 4.3
--0000-00-00
4.64 x 1.95 x 0.87 inches5.95 x 3.13 x 0.31 inches
3.76 ounces5.43 ounces
--Brown
$ 95.00$ 95.00
Display / Screen
--5.7 inches
96 x 65 pixels 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD)
LCDSuper AMOLED
--386 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
2.88.9
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset
processorKrait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor
--3 GB RAM
GPUAdreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU
5.769.27
Storage
--32 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot
07.56
Camera
--13.00 MP + 2.00 MP
06.93
Networks
--Wi-Fi
GPRS and GSMLTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS
SIM--
0.25.9
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery2800mAh Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
240 hours standby time
5.5 hours talk time
370 hours standby time
16 hours talk time
2.564.8
Other Features
--Bluetooth 4.0
--GPS
--NFC
--Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Samsung Galaxy Round is a lot better than the Nokia 3595, having a 73.2 score against 23.3. Samsung Galaxy Round's design is way heavier but a lot thinner than the Nokia 3595. The Galaxy Round has a much more powerful processing unit than Nokia 3595, because it has a graphics processing unit and a higher number of faster cores.

The Samsung Galaxy Round counts with a much better looking display than Nokia 3595, because it has a much higher resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Galaxy Round counts with a much better camera than Nokia 3595. The Galaxy Round counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 3595, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 64 GB.

The Galaxy Round features a superior battery lifetime than Nokia 3595, because it has a 2800mAh battery size.

The Galaxy Round and the Nokia 3595 cost the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.