Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 41.7 | 45.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Symbian 9.4 | Android 2.1, 1.5 |
| 2008-10-02 | 2010-01-06 |
| 4.37 x 2.04 x 0.61 inches | 4.25 x 2.09 x 0.60 inches |
| 3.84 ounces | 4.69 ounces |
| $ 219.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 3.1 inches |
| 360 x 640 pixels | 320 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 229 pixels per inch | 186 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | Capacitive |
| 6.9 | 6.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm MSM7200A chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor | Single-Core 528 MHz processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 256 MB RAM |
| 3D image engine GPU | GPU |
| 6.48 | 6.66 |
| Storage | |
| 82,94 MB internal memory | 262,14 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.5 | 2.12 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 320 x 240 (25 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 5.72 | 5.83 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 3.3 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1320mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 406 hours standby time 8.8 hours talk time | 315 hours standby time 5.8 hours talk time |
| 3.04 | 3.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Compass |
Comparison review
Motorola BACKFLIP has an overall score of 45.5, which is a bit better than Nokia 5800 XpressMusic's 41.7 overall score. Motorola BACKFLIP has Android 2.1 operating system, and Nokia 5800 XpressMusic comes with Symbian 9.4 operating system. The Motorola BACKFLIP construction is newer and just a little bit thinner, but also heavier than the Nokia 5800 XpressMusic.
Nokia 5800 XpressMusic features just a bit better screen than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has a quite greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen, a better resolution of 640 x 360px and a bit larger display. The Motorola BACKFLIP features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 5800 XpressMusic, because it has 179,2 MB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola BACKFLIP features a bit better performance than Nokia 5800 XpressMusic, and although they both have 1 processing cores, the Motorola BACKFLIP also has more RAM. The Motorola BACKFLIP features a little better battery performance than Nokia 5800 XpressMusic, because it has a 1400mAh battery size instead of 1320mAh.
The Motorola BACKFLIP has just a bit better camera than Nokia 5800 XpressMusic, because although it has slower 25 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola BACKFLIP also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola BACKFLIP is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.