Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 33.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2006-11-28 | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.14 x 1.74 x 0.73 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 2.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 139.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.2 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| STN | AMOLED |
| 137 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 5,12 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 970mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.56 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has a global score of 77.9, which is a lot better than the Nokia 6086's overall score of 33.3. Although the Motorola DROID Turbo is way heavier than Nokia 6086, it's extremely thinner and also newer. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much more vibrant display than Nokia 6086, because it has a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a much higher display density.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much faster CPU than Nokia 6086, because it has a higher number of faster cores and an additional graphics processor. Motorola DROID Turbo shoots greater photos and videos than Nokia 6086, because it has a back facing camera with a way better resolution. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Nokia 6086, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a way better battery duration than Nokia 6086, because it has a 3900mAh battery size against 970mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Motorola DROID Turbo is also a bit cheaper, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.