Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2009-01-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.28 x 1.82 x 0.46 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 3.39 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 175.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 182 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 64 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 17,41 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 4 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.86 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.61 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 450 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.64 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is way better than Nokia 6303 classic, getting a 76.4 score against 35.7. The Motorola Droid Turbo construction is much newer and just a bit thinner, but much heavier than Nokia 6303 classic. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a lot better looking screen than Nokia 6303 classic, because it has a way better 2560 x 1440 resolution, a much larger display and a much greater number of pixels per display inch.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better performing CPU than Nokia 6303 classic, because it has a greater number of cores, an additional graphics processing unit and a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Droid Turbo shoots way better photographs and videos than Nokia 6303 classic, because it has a camera with way more megapixels and a way better video resolution.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Nokia 6303 classic, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Nokia 6303 classic, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity against 1050mAh.
Motorola Droid Turbo costs a bit more money than Nokia 6303 classic, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.