Compare phones
Nokia 6350
6350Samsung Star
GT-S5230| Global Score | |
| 35.1 | 38.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2009-10-01 | 2009-03-10 |
| 3.67 x 1.86 x 0.68 inches | 4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches |
| 3.62 ounces | 3.25 ounces |
| Gray and Red | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | 3 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 400 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 200 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Resistive |
| 6.6 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 30,72 MB internal memory | 51,2 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 3.20 MP |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 5.28 | 5.39 |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.9 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 432 hours standby time 4.2 hours talk time | 800 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 2.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Accelerometer |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Star has a score of 38.4, which is slightly better than the Nokia 6350's 35.1 score. Samsung Star's construction is lighter and way thinner than the Nokia 6350, even though both were released only 7 months apart. The Samsung Star features a processing unit that is very similar to the Nokia 6350 one, both have the same number of cores.
The Nokia 6350 counts with a brighter display than Samsung Star, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 320 x 240 pixels and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Star has as much storage capacity to install applications and games as the Nokia 6350, because although the Samsung Star has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 20,48 MB more internal memory.
The Nokia 6350 features a bit better battery life than Samsung Star, because it has 1050mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Star features a little bit better camera than Nokia 6350, and although they both have the same 15 frames per second video frame rate and the same 320x240 (QVGA) video quality, the Samsung Star also has a back facing camera with a lot better 3.2 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Star not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.