Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Symbian Belle | -- |
| 2011-08-24 | 2019-08-16 |
| 4.61 x 2.24 x 0.43 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.62 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gray and Purple | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 319.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 360 x 640 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 210 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Broadcom BCM2763 chip, GPU @ 250 MHz with 128 MB GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 504 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.04 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is much better than the Nokia 701, with a score of 78.5 against 51.4. Although Motorola One Action is incredibly heavier than the Nokia 701, it's thinner and also way newer. The Motorola One Action counts with a much greater processing power than Nokia 701, because it has 3,5 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
Motorola One Action has a brighter screen than Nokia 701, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2520 resolution, a much bigger screen and a way greater count of pixels per inch of display. Motorola One Action shoots a lot better videos and photos than Nokia 701, because it has a way more MP camera and a lot better (4K) video quality.
The Motorola One Action features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Nokia 701, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and 120 GB more internal memory. The Motorola One Action has a much better battery duration than Nokia 701, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola One Action is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Nokia 701, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.