Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-12-21 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 407 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a lot better than the Nokia 8.1, getting an 87 score against 72.1. The Motorola razr (2020) design has the same thickness than the Nokia 8.1, but it's a little bit heavier. These devices work with Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has newer 11 version and Nokia 8.1 has Android 10 version, providing you some nice extra features.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit better CPU than Nokia 8.1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory. Nokia 8.1 has a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a display with the same size, the Nokia 8.1 also has a little bit higher 1080 x 2280px resolution and a little bit greater pixel density.
Motorola razr (2020) features more memory to install applications and games than Nokia 8.1, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior camera than Nokia 8.1, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution, a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and videos and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
Nokia 8.1 has greater battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.