Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-12-21 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 407 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is way better than Nokia 8.1, with a score of 88.5 against 72.1. Although Galaxy Z Flip is just a little heavier than Nokia 8.1, it's just a bit thinner and also newer. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Nokia 8.1 has Android 10 version, providing you some nice extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little sharper display than Nokia 8.1, because it has a bit bigger display, a quite better pixel count in each inch in the display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip has more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 8.1, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little better performance than Nokia 8.1, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip captures just a bit better videos and photos than Nokia 8.1, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same video definition, a same size sensor and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Nokia 8.1 counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.