Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-12-21 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 407 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than Nokia 8.1, having a global score of 92.3 against 72.1. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Nokia 8.1 has Android 10 version. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is newer and a little bit thinner, but a little heavier than Nokia 8.1.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit sharper display than Nokia 8.1, because it has a bit bigger screen, a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Nokia 8.1, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 8.1, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Nokia 8.1 has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Nokia 8.1, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 mega-pixels, the same video definition, a 0.39 inches camera sensor and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.