Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-23 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Polar night | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 387 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is a bit better than the Nokia 8.3 5G's overall score of 80.5. The iPhone 8 design is extremely lighter and thinner than the Nokia 8.3 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The iPhone 8 counts with a slightly better display than Nokia 8.3 5G, although it has a little lower display density, a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334px and a lot smaller display.
The Nokia 8.3 5G has a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The iPhone 8 counts with a little bit better processing power than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone 8's camera is just as good as the camera in Nokia 8.3 5G, because although the Apple iPhone 8 has a camera with lot less MP, a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a much smaller sensor taking way worse quality videos and images, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Nokia 8.3 5G features a superior battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Nokia 8.3 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Nokia 8.3 5G. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Nokia 8.3 5G, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.