Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-23 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Polar night | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than Nokia 8.3 5G, getting an 81.6 score against 80.5. Even though Google Pixel 2 is noticeably older than Nokia 8.3 5G, it's design is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner. The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little more vivid display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density. The Nokia 8.3 5G features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Nokia 8.3 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera and a larger sensor.
Nokia 8.3 5G has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 2 is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.