Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-23 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Polar night | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 8.3 5G has a general score of 80.5, which is just a bit better than LG V30's score of 79.1. The Nokia 8.3 5G construction is way newer than the LG V30's, although it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Nokia 8.3 5G features just a little better processing power than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has more RAM memory.
LG V30 has a little bit better display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a higher pixel quantity per screen inch. LG V30 features slightly more storage for games and applications than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Nokia 8.3 5G captures just a bit better pictures and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting images or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Nokia 8.3 5G also counts with a much better 64 MP resolution camera in the back and a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with longer battery life than LG V30, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V30. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Nokia 8.3 5G, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG V30, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.