Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-23 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Polar night | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 449.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 387 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8.3 5G is slightly better than Moto G Stylus, having a global score of 80.5 against 79.7. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 OS, so both should offer very similar operating system features. Even though the Nokia 8.3 5G and the Moto G Stylus were only released with a few months difference, the Nokia 8.3 5G body is somewhat heavier but a little bit thinner.
Nokia 8.3 5G has a little faster processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola Moto G Stylus and Nokia 8.3 5G feature similar displays, because although the Motorola Moto G Stylus has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much better camera than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a lower video quality and a back facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality and a larger diafragm aperture. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with as much memory capacity for applications and games as Nokia 8.3 5G, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Nokia 8.3 5G has a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Stylus. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G Stylus, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.