Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-09-23 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Polar night | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 449.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 387 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is slightly better than the Nokia 8.3 5G's global score of 80.5. The Galaxy A32 body is a bit thicker but a bit lighter than Nokia 8.3 5G, and both were only released 4 months apart. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, while Nokia 8.3 5G comes with Android 11 operating system.
Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Nokia 8.3 5G has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a little larger screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a slightly better camera than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a worse video definition and a much worse 48 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture. The Nokia 8.3 5G features a bit more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a bit superior battery life than Nokia 8.3 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.