Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than Nokia 8 Sirocco, having a 79.7 score against 74.2. The Nokia 8 Sirocco counts with just a bit better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Nokia 8 Sirocco has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Nokia 8 Sirocco also has 2 GB more RAM. Moto G Stylus counts with a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto G Stylus also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus features better battery life than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a 23% more battery capacity. Moto G Stylus counts with a way better camera than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Moto G Stylus also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.