Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-04-20 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 7.23 ounces |
| Black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 534 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is better than the Nokia 8 Sirocco's 74.2 global score. Nokia 8 Sirocco features a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a way greater screen density.
Nokia 8 Sirocco counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 768 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Nokia 8 Sirocco has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Nokia 8 Sirocco also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A32 features a much better camera than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much longer battery life than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a 53% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.