Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the Nokia 8 Sirocco's 74.2 overall score. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better screen than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a really larger screen and a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The Nokia 8 Sirocco has a way better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a 75% more battery size. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot more MP back facing camera and a much bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.