Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-12 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, having an 81.6 score against 80.3. The Google Pixel 2 body is thinner and notably lighter than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, although it was released 3 years before. The Google Pixel 2's processing unit is just as good as Nokia 8 V 5G UW's processing unit, and although the Google Pixel 2 has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a really smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels per display inch. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a way larger camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures, a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and better video frame rates.
The Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.